Imagine discovering at retirement that your KiwiSaver nest egg is bursting with more money than you ever anticipated – a financial jackpot that could change your golden years. But here's the twist: this potential windfall comes with its own set of intriguing dilemmas that might make you question if you're actually saving too much. Stick around to uncover why your KiwiSaver balance could end up surpassing projections, and explore the controversies swirling around these optimistic forecasts.
Just a short while ago, in a report from RNZ with visuals by Rebekah Parsons-King, it was highlighted how you might be poised to amass significantly more in your KiwiSaver (a government-backed retirement savings scheme in New Zealand designed to help everyday Kiwis build a secure future) than the official estimates suggest.
Picture this: Every year, your KiwiSaver provider sends you an annual statement outlining the total amount you're projected to have saved by age 65, along with what that translates to in weekly income during retirement. These figures aren't pulled from thin air; they're grounded in assumptions laid out by the government, which factor in the expected returns from your chosen fund.
Interestingly, these same assumptions power most online calculators you might turn to for planning your savings strategy. For beginners dipping their toes into retirement planning, think of KiwiSaver as a superannuation scheme where the government matches your contributions, and funds are categorized by risk levels – from conservative (safer, lower returns) to aggressive (higher risk, potentially higher gains).
But here's where it gets controversial: Many KiwiSaver funds have been outperforming these conservative projections by more than double for several years running. The government stipulates that conservative funds should count on an annual return of just 2.5 percent after deducting fees and taxes, while balanced funds aim for 3.5 percent, growth funds for 4.5 percent, and aggressive ones for 5.5 percent. These rates sound modest, but they're meant to be cautious to avoid overpromising.
Take the growth fund benchmark, for instance. According to Greg Bunkall, data director at Morningstar, it has delivered an impressive 8.8 percent annual return over the past decade, even before accounting for inflation. That's a real-world example of how markets can surprise you – imagine investing in growth funds during a booming economy, like the tech-driven rallies we've seen, leading to gains far above the projections.
Rupert Carlyon, founder of Koura Wealth, adds another layer by noting that taxes could shave off about 1 percent from those returns. He points out that the last 10 years saw New Zealand markets soar at around 14 percent annually in dollar terms, compared to a historical average of 9 percent. Looking ahead, firms like Blackrock predict equity returns in the 5 to 6 percent range for the next decade. After fees and taxes, this puts actual returns below the 5.5 percent assumption for growth funds.
"It's crucial to recognize that recent years have been exceptional," Carlyon explains, making it easier for newcomers to grasp why past performance isn't always a guarantee. "The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) is playing it safe with these assumptions, and I believe that's prudent. It's better to have more than you expected than to fall short due to overly optimistic guesses. On the flip side, this could push people to save excessively, turning their retirement goals into a tougher climb than necessary." He references how this over-saving ties into issues like hardship withdrawals, where unexpected expenses force some to dip into their savings prematurely – a relatable struggle for anyone facing financial uncertainty.
And this is the part most people miss: The assumptions haven't been updated since their inception, leaving questions about the underlying calculations. Carlyon suggests a deeper dive into what drove those returns could reveal whether this conservatism is still appropriate in today's dynamic market environment.
Mike Taylor, founder of Pie Funds, weighs in with a bolder perspective, arguing that growth funds could reasonably target 6 percent returns, and aggressive ones might even hit 8 percent. For beginners, this highlights how fund risk levels affect potential earnings – a conservative fund might be like parking your money in a low-interest savings account, while aggressive funds are akin to betting on high-stakes stocks that could soar or crash.
At Kernel, founder Dean Anderson emphasizes the value of standardized assumptions to prevent providers from inflating projections to attract customers. "It's preferable to err on the side of caution rather than hype up unrealistic returns," he says. "However, these figures are now quite modest, potentially understating long-term possibilities and creating a false sense of underachievement."
Danielle McKenzie, financial markets manager at the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, acknowledges that the regulatory formula for projecting KiwiSaver returns, outlined in the Financial Markets Conduct Regulations, is due for a review. "While it's not on our current agenda, we'll consider it as part of future priorities," she notes, without specifying a timeline.
This conservative approach sparks debate: Is it protecting savers from disappointment, or unfairly burdening them with the pressure to save more than needed? Critics might argue it's a missed opportunity to reflect current market realities, potentially discouraging participation. Supporters, however, see it as a safeguard against the volatility of investments. What do you think – should KiwiSaver projections be updated to better match real-world performance, or is the current caution a wise strategy? Share your thoughts in the comments below; do you agree that over-saving could complicate retirement, or do you see it as a necessary evil in uncertain times? Join the conversation!
Don't miss out on staying informed – sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter that dives into the latest on earning, spending, and investing your hard-earned cash.
