Every November, the air in northern India transforms into a toxic haze, leaving millions gasping for breath. But here's the shocking truth: India's official air quality readings max out at 500, even when the air is far more poisonous. This begs the question: Are we being given the full picture? And why does this cap exist in the first place?
Imagine starting your day by checking the air quality, only to find wildly different numbers depending on the app you use. Government-approved platforms like SAFAR and SAMEER stick to the 500 limit, based on India's Air Quality Index (AQI). This index simplifies complex data on pollutants like PM2.5, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide into a single, understandable number. But here's where it gets controversial: private and international monitors like IQAir and AQI often show readings soaring past 600, even reaching 1,000 on particularly bad days. This discrepancy leaves residents confused and concerned – which numbers reflect the true danger?
India's AQI categorizes anything above 200 as causing breathing difficulties, with levels above 400 deemed 'severe'. But the scale stops at 500, a limit set over a decade ago when the National Air Quality Index was introduced. Gufran Beig, founder of SAFAR, explains that this cap was initially intended to prevent panic, as exceeding 500 indicated a critical situation requiring immediate action. However, this approach essentially flattens the data, treating all readings above 500 as equally severe, regardless of the actual pollution levels.
And this is the part most people miss: international organizations and platforms don't impose such caps, allowing for a more accurate representation of air quality. The World Health Organization (WHO), for instance, considers PM2.5 levels above 15 micrograms per cubic meter hazardous, while India's threshold is a staggering 60 micrograms. This highlights a crucial point: there's no universal AQI standard. Countries like the US, China, and the European Union have their own pollutant thresholds, tailored to their specific environments and needs.
The difference doesn't stop at thresholds; it extends to the tools used. India's pollution control board relies on Beta Attenuation Monitors (BAMs), which physically measure particle mass with precise calibration. In contrast, platforms like IQAir use sensor-based monitors employing laser scattering and electrochemical methods to estimate particle counts. Abhijeet Pathak, a former scientist with India's pollution control board, points out that these sensors, while valuable, cannot be calibrated for every reading and haven't yet been officially approved by the Indian government.
Environmental scientists and activists, including Mr. Pathak, are calling for a comprehensive revision of India's air quality framework, which hasn't been updated since 2009. They advocate for incorporating sensor-based data and removing the 500 cap, especially since research increasingly shows that health risks worsen with increasing pollution levels.
Ultimately, India's AQI doesn't stop at 500 because the pollution magically disappears at that point. It stops because the system was designed with a built-in ceiling. This raises important questions: Should India adopt a more dynamic and transparent air quality monitoring system? And how can we ensure that citizens have access to accurate and actionable information about the air they breathe? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X, and Facebook for more in-depth reporting on this critical issue.
